- Why the concerns about excess population growth and rising inequality aren’t all they’re cracked up to be – and why progress itself is potentially the solution to these problems
- Why a bottom-up view of historical innovation is necessary to better understand our history – and how bottom-up views combine with top-down “grand theories” to give us an accurate picture of progress
- Why some inventions are “behind their time” (like the bicycle) and what they can teach us about innovation
Check out the episode at the links below. If you enjoyed the episode, the best way to support the show is to share with your friends, so send them a link.
- Google Play
- Or stream here:
- If you’re enjoying the show, why not a leave a review? It makes a difference in terms of other people finding the show.
Check out more from Jason and The Roots of Progress here:
- [01:04] Disabusing my 16-year-old self of some misguided assumptions about the nature of progress – and all the ways in which life is better now for just about everyone than it was in 1700.
- [10:10] Common arguments against “progress”: zero-sum thinking and Malthusian concerns about population. And, the unexpected developments that change the population calculus.
- [17:16] Why Jason is skeptical of arguments about “relative happiness” and increasing inequality.
- [19:27] Behaviorally modern humans have been around for a long time, so why wasn’t there “progress”? What changed that caused us to start inventing things much more quickly?
- [28:13] Are there broad sociological trends that kickstart progress (like WEIRD psychology and the Catholic Church)?
- [34:27] Jason prefers to take a bottom-up approach to understanding progress through specific examples of inventions like bicycles, steel, vaccines, etc.
- [41:02] What about ideas that potentially require several things to go correctly at a time? Do these kinds of ideas resist “tinkering” or are do they have tangible intermediate steps?
- [45:40] Are we really in a period of scientific and economic stagnation – as argued by Tyler Cowen, Patrick Collison, Peter Thiel and others? Or, are we just waiting for the next “S Curve” of progress to take off?
- [53:14] Why hasn’t the increased accessibility to information facilitated by the internet resulted in more progress? What are the negative impacts of things like bureaucratic calcification and institutions that optimize for things like prestige and politics over progress?
- [01:06:42] Coming soon on The Roots of Progress: Mortality rates and public health improvements, agriculture and the economics of food, and how to build a bridge that doesn’t collapse.
Links and Resources Mentioned
- “Mouse Utopia” from Gwern
- “The Population Bomb” by Paul Ehrlich
- Our World in Data
- “A Culture of Growth” by Joel Mokyr
- “How the Catholic Church Created Our Liberal World” by Tanner Greer
- “The Origins of WEIRD Psychology” by Jonathan Schulz, Duman Bahrami-Rad, Jonathan Beauchamp, Joseph Henrich
- “Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress” by Steven Pinker
- Alex Tabarrok
- “Ideas Behind Their Time” from Marginal Revolution
- “Isaac Newton, World’s Most Famous Alchemist” from Discover Magazine
- Peter Thiel
- Patrick Collison
- Tyler Cowen
- “Is Science Stagnant?” by Patrick Collison & Michael Nielsen
- “Is the rate of scientific progress slowing down?” by Tyler Cowen & Ben Southwood
- The Large Hadron Collider
- Khan Academy
- Marc Andreessen
- Reid Hoffman
- “The circular flow and GDP” from Khan Academy
- Y Combinator
- “The Great Bridge: The Epic Story of the Building of the Brooklyn Bridge” by David McCullough
You May Also Like These Posts
I send out a weekly newsletter that includes any articles and podcasts that I've written and recorded, as well as other stuff (articles, podcasts, songs, etc.) that I've enjoyed. Sign up here to be added to the list.